← New Search ↗ Social Card

Martins Leps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-22 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NA3HL 45 3 24 27 0.600 0.0753 0.0753 0.1894 0.1894
2022-23 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Premier 41 12 25 37 0.902 0.1180 0.1128 0.3063 0.2929
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 24 0 1 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2023-24 · New England College
-54.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5259
Defenseman overall
#1314
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.