IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Albert Lea USHS-MN 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0142 0.0142 0.0280 0.0280
2020-21 Albert Lea USHS-MN 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0068 0.0068 0.0135 0.0135
2021-22 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 44 7 9 16 0.364 0.0410 0.0424 0.1237 0.1279
2022-23 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 27 0 5 5 0.185 0.0271 0.0275 0.0908 0.0921
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE SO 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21915
Defenseman overall
#3602
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cooper Hoheisel
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Olenczak
Amherst · 2023-24
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Pao
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.