← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Hoheisel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Chisago Lakes High USHS-MN 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Elite 17 9 9 18 1.059 0.0985 0.1066 0.2425 0.2624
2017-18 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 44 24 21 45 1.023 0.1342 0.1389 0.3472 0.3593
2018-19 — NA3HL 40 16 6 22 0.550 0.0701 0.0684 0.1740 0.1698
2019-20 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 43 34 44 78 1.814 0.2380 0.2380 0.6159 0.6159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Finlandia D1 — FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2020-21 Finlandia D3 — FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Finlandia
+101.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9961
Forward overall
#458
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.