| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Chisago Lakes High | USHS-MN | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Minnesota Mullets | USPHL-Elite | 17 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 1.059 | 0.0789 | 0.0854 | 0.2425 | 0.2624 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota Mullets | USPHL-Premier | 44 | 24 | 21 | 45 | 1.023 | 0.1154 | 0.1194 | 0.3472 | 0.3593 |
| 2018-19 | — | NA3HL | 40 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 0.550 | 0.0608 | 0.0593 | 0.1736 | 0.1694 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota Mullets | USPHL-Premier | 43 | 34 | 44 | 78 | 1.814 | 0.2046 | 0.2046 | 0.6159 | 0.6159 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Finlandia | D1 | — | FR | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.167 |
| 2020-21 | Finlandia | D3 | — | FR | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.167 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.