IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Useldinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 53 10 17 27 0.509 0.1810 0.1789 0.5373 0.5311
2011-12 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 60 14 25 39 0.650 0.2309 0.2169 0.6856 0.6439
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 29 10 13 23 0.793
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 7 9 16 0.615
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 26 1 6 7 0.269
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 21 1 6 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stout
+93.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23274
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 1991
#1706
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gobel
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrik Peltola
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.