IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Mona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.0770 0.0811 0.1631 0.1717
2016-17 Okanagan European Eagles USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 5 9 14 0.424 0.1191 0.1201 0.3488 0.3518
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#42870
Forward overall
#2110
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Lepore
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian DiFelice
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Amato
SUNY Brockport · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.