← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 NA3HL 32 1 4 5 0.156 0.0196 0.0196 0.0493 0.0493
2021-22 NA3HL 49 18 42 60 1.224 0.1537 0.1510 0.3866 0.3799
2022-23 Soo Eagles NOJHL 21 4 3 7 0.333 0.0557 0.0515 0.1388 0.1284
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083
2024-25 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083
2022-23 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083
2021-22 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083
2020-21 Oakland University ACHA_D1 12 4 9 13 1.083

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41362
Forward overall
#2581
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.