IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Gagnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — SJHL 34 3 4 7 0.206 0.0528 0.0528 0.1552 0.1552
2020-21 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 33 4 18 22 0.667 0.0872 0.0872 0.2263 0.2263
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.1375 0.1283 0.4504 0.4204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC — 27 8 8 16 0.593
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC — 22 2 2 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Alvernia
+50.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10300
Defenseman overall
#1945
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Meehan
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Flammia
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.