IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duncan Fleming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 28 7 17 24 0.857 0.2307 0.2307 0.2082 0.2082
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 15 5 7 12 0.800 0.1510 0.1510 0.1802 0.1802
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 37 16 18 34 0.919 0.1735 0.1672 0.2069 0.1994
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 31 3 7 10 0.323 0.1135 0.1102 0.1582 0.1537
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38279
Forward overall
#2373
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Nyman
Hamline · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Freiermuth
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Flack
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.