IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benji Peiffer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHLP 15 1 3 4 0.267 0.0306 0.0306 0.0601 0.0601
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.0660 0.0720 0.1398 0.1524
2022-23 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 44 4 6 10 0.227 0.0298 0.0301 0.0772 0.0779
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16750
Defenseman overall
#3040
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Charron
Lake Forest · 2009-10
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Carson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bissett
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.