← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Bissett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Apollo High USHS-MN 23 14 9 23 1.000 0.1266 0.1245 0.2429 0.2389
2016-17 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 33 4 7 11 0.333 0.0418 0.0419 0.1052 0.1055
2017-18 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 43 16 18 34 0.791 0.0992 0.0944 0.2496 0.2375
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2020-21 Hamline D1 MIAC JR 6 1 1 2 0.333
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 6 1 1 2 0.333
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 25 6 3 9 0.360
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 6 3 9 0.360
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen 26 3 3 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+267.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33682
Forward overall
#1585
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.