IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Bissett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Apollo High USHS-MN 23 14 9 23 1.000 0.2692 0.2648 0.2429 0.2389
2016-17 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 33 4 7 11 0.333 0.0402 0.0403 0.1053 0.1056
2017-18 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 43 16 18 34 0.791 0.0953 0.0907 0.2498 0.2377
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 6 1 1 2 0.333
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 6 3 9 0.360
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 26 3 3 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+282.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34125
Forward overall
#1556
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley See
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Brown
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Rahn
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.