← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Carson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Neepawa Titans MJHL 52 0 3 3 0.058 0.0111 0.0117 0.0364 0.0385
2017-18 Neepawa Titans MJHL 60 5 13 18 0.300 0.0577 0.0582 0.1891 0.1907
2018-19 Neepawa Titans MJHL 56 5 20 25 0.446 0.0859 0.0819 0.2813 0.2682
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen FR 23 3 3 6 0.261
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 23 3 3 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Stout
+281.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19526
Defenseman overall
#2728
Defenseman born in 1998
#1497
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.