IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Charron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 50 18 25 43 0.860 0.2108 0.2065 0.5914 0.5794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2012-13 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 27 5 5 10 0.370
2011-12 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2010-11 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2010-11 · Lake Forest
-48.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20350
Forward overall
#804
Forward born in 1990
#805
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2013-14
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2015-16
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Crawford
Adrian · 2007-08
0.562 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.