IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Noll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 32 1 4 5 0.156 0.0361 0.0364 0.1263 0.1274
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2024-25 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 11 1 0 1 0.091
2023-24 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49402
Forward overall
#3316
Forward born in 2003
#1582
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Becker
Lebanon Valley · 2005-06
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Dion
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Worthley
Wentworth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.