IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Esquerre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 43 6 8 14 0.326 0.0426 0.0425 0.1105 0.1101
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 41 14 22 36 0.878 0.1148 0.1088 0.2980 0.2824
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26256
Forward overall
#1482
Forward born in 2002
#1933
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jameson Lundquist
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Singleton
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.