← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane McElhaney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 34 0 6 6 0.176 0.0340 0.0340 0.0808 0.0808
2020-21 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 35 9 26 35 1.000 0.1128 0.1128 0.3402 0.3402
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 40 1 9 10 0.250 0.0578 0.0570 0.2021 0.1994
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 1 10 11 0.220 0.0508 0.0472 0.1779 0.1655
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 32 10 20 30 0.938
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 25 3 9 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Assumption
+893.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8366
Defenseman overall
#1924
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.