IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Rodgers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHLP 42 4 18 22 0.524 0.0601 0.0597 0.1181 0.1174
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0277 0.0275 0.0587 0.0583
2017-18 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 49 5 15 20 0.408 0.0943 0.0884 0.1997 0.1873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Western New England D1 CNE SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Western New England D1 CNE FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15100
Defenseman overall
#2175
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Brown
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Hart
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Kishko
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.