IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Janesville Jets NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 — NAHL 55 3 23 26 0.473 0.1680 0.1553 0.4986 0.4608
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7592
Defenseman overall
#1106
Defenseman born in 1990
#2690
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Lepone
Canton · 2014-15
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Roll
Amherst · 2012-13
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.