IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dimitri Voyatzis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Ogden Mustangs USPHL-Premier 46 16 27 43 0.935 0.1054 0.1102 0.3180 0.3325
2022-23 Ogden Mustangs USPHL-Premier 50 35 47 82 1.640 0.1850 0.1844 0.5579 0.5559
2023-24 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 49 17 37 54 1.102 0.2547 0.2431 0.8911 0.8506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE — 26 5 14 19 0.731
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE — 23 2 8 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Nichols
+131.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5059
Forward overall
#151
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.