← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rowan Heithoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-05 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blake USHS-MN 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0137 0.0137 0.0270 0.0270
2020-21 Blake USHS-MN 18 2 8 10 0.556 0.0684 0.0684 0.1350 0.1350
2021-22 Blake USHS-MN 26 11 15 26 1.000 0.1232 0.1232 0.2429 0.2429
2022-23 Blake USHS-MN 26 32 21 53 2.038 0.2511 0.2511 0.4952 0.4952
2023-24 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 17 2 2 4 0.235 0.0454 0.0454 0.1077 0.1077
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 21 3 6 9 0.429
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC 21 6 2 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Williams
+248.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19211
Forward overall
#1027
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2006-07
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.