IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 45 4 8 12 0.267 0.0295 0.0309 0.0845 0.0885
2016-17 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Neumann D1 — SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D1 — JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2018-19 Neumann D1 — SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#30351
Defenseman overall
#3127
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shaun Doetzel
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Gertsakis
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.