← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Little Falls USHS-MN 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0056 0.0056 0.0111 0.0111
2022-23 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 47 10 5 15 0.319 0.0737 0.0724 0.2580 0.2535
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 51 6 20 26 0.510 0.1178 0.1091 0.4122 0.3817
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 UCHC 25 3 3 6 0.240
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC 27 3 5 8 0.296
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30331
Forward overall
#1776
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.