IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rory Andriole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 28 2 2 4 0.143 0.0276 0.0276 0.0654 0.0654
2021-22 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0231 0.0231 0.0549 0.0549
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 42 13 17 30 0.714 0.1045 0.1055 0.3502 0.3537
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 40 17 37 54 1.350 0.1975 0.1895 0.6619 0.6350
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC — 21 0 1 1 0.048
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC — 19 5 2 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2024-25 · Tufts
+176.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15314
Forward overall
#752
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Singer
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Felser
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.