IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Castino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampton NE-Prep 13 2 5 7 0.538 0.1039 0.1039 0.2464 0.2464
2021-22 New Hampton NE-Prep 31 2 15 17 0.548 0.1058 0.1058 0.2509 0.2509
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 34 3 10 13 0.382 0.0884 0.0903 0.3092 0.3158
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 37 4 6 10 0.270 0.0625 0.0603 0.2186 0.2109
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 23 6 11 17 0.739
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 22 3 4 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Castleton
+414.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32845
Forward overall
#1983
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Gast
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Meltzer
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Boswell
Nichols · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.