← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Keese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 20 0 7 7 0.350 0.0459 0.0459 0.1188 0.1188
2020-21 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 40 0 12 12 0.300 0.0394 0.0394 0.1019 0.1019
2021-22 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 39 1 14 15 0.385 0.0505 0.0518 0.1306 0.1340
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 42 3 33 36 0.857 0.1125 0.1099 0.2910 0.2843
2023-24 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 9 38 47 1.205 0.1581 0.1468 0.4091 0.3799
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 23 3 8 11 0.478
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · Albertus Magnus
+74.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3302
Defenseman overall
#823
Defenseman born in 2003
#959
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.