IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abram Snider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 French River Rapids NOJHL 39 4 4 8 0.205 0.0349 0.0354 0.0869 0.0883
2022-23 French River Rapids NOJHL 54 5 10 15 0.278 0.0473 0.0460 0.1177 0.1145
2023-24 French River Rapids NOJHL 51 5 16 21 0.412 0.0701 0.0645 0.1745 0.1606
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC SO 17 0 3 3 0.176
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC — 24 1 4 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2024-25 · Neumann
+286.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21144
Defenseman overall
#3527
Defenseman born in 2003
#1294
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Bradley
Endicott · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Cryer
Neumann · 2003-04
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Spring
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.