IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Kontir Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 36 5 8 13 0.361 0.0407 0.0409 0.1228 0.1235
2023-24 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 18 17 35 0.897 0.1012 0.0969 0.3053 0.2923
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 25 6 6 12 0.480
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 21 2 2 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Lebanon Valley
+198.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24730
Forward overall
#1369
Forward born in 2003
#1793
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Ramoundos
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Tenezaca
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly O'Brien
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.