IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corbin Melie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Albany Academy NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0263 0.0263 0.0624 0.0624
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 40 9 13 22 0.550 0.0805 0.0806 0.2697 0.2702
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 46 13 25 38 0.826 0.1209 0.1150 0.4050 0.3853
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 17 2 4 6 0.353
2024-25 Elmira D3 UCHC — 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2024-25 · Elmira
+49.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6496
Defenseman overall
#1584
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Witman
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Romasco
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.