IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Crooks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NA3HL 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0204 0.0204 0.0506 0.0506
2021-22 — NA3HL 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.0356 0.0373 0.0883 0.0925
2022-23 Butte Irish NA3HL 47 30 23 53 1.128 0.1437 0.1439 0.3567 0.3573
2023-24 — NA3HL 47 38 35 73 1.553 0.1979 0.1887 0.4913 0.4685
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 23 4 1 5 0.217
2024-25 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Anna Maria
-28.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20118
Forward overall
#1046
Forward born in 2003
#425
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aiden Lindley
Stevenson · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.