← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Schwartzhoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Woodbury USHS-MN 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.0389 0.0389 0.0767 0.0767
2021-22 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 40 2 3 5 0.125 0.0138 0.0140 0.0396 0.0403
2022-23 NA3HL 35 0 8 8 0.229 0.0253 0.0246 0.0724 0.0704
2023-24 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 47 0 17 17 0.362 0.0400 0.0370 0.1146 0.1059
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA 16 0 3 3 0.188
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2024-25 · Lawrence
+154.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23830
Defenseman overall
#3805
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2021-22
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2009-10
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.