← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dom Balboni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0308 0.0308 0.0763 0.0763
2020-21 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 38 30 24 54 1.421 0.1312 0.1312 0.3254 0.3254
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 40 9 15 24 0.600 0.0785 0.0824 0.2036 0.2138
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 29 29 58 1.349 0.1764 0.1765 0.4578 0.4582
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 24 45 69 1.605 0.2099 0.1999 0.5446 0.5188
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2024-25 · Westfield State
-61.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8098
Forward overall
#321
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.