← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dennis Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 4 3 7 0.269 0.0541 0.0541 0.1231 0.1231
2022-23 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 15 14 29 1.074 0.2160 0.2160 0.4912 0.4912
2023-24 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 14 17 31 1.192 0.2398 0.2398 0.5452 0.5452
2024-25 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 14 14 28 1.037 0.2085 0.2085 0.4742 0.4742
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 23 8 4 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2025-26 · Tufts
+175.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15153
Forward overall
#610
Forward born in 2006
#78
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.