IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Gwatkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0075 0.0075 0.0169 0.0169
2021-22 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0424 0.0424 0.0963 0.0963
2022-23 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 26 1 6 7 0.269 0.0543 0.0543 0.1232 0.1232
2023-24 Boston Dogs EHL 40 1 6 7 0.175 0.0376 0.0374 0.0857 0.0852
2024-25 — EHL 30 3 15 18 0.600 0.1288 0.1215 0.2938 0.2771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 — FR 21 1 9 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2025-26 · Southern Maine
+474.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11220
Defenseman overall
#2021
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Knowlton
Trinity · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Muller
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Hirschhaut
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.