| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Kenai River Brown Bears | NAHL | 57 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 0.702 | 0.2606 | 0.2530 | 0.7431 | 0.7214 |
| 2011-12 | Kenai River Brown Bears | NAHL | 51 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 0.686 | 0.2548 | 0.2348 | 0.7267 | 0.6697 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | FR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.