IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.D. Shoniker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 35 1 3 4 0.114 0.0343 0.0361 0.0782 0.0823
2023-24 King Rebellion OJHL 47 2 2 4 0.085 0.0256 0.0243 0.0583 0.0553
2024-25 Boston Dogs NCDC 22 2 1 3 0.136 0.0761 0.0709 0.1103 0.1027
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 22 3 2 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Beloit
+408.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43835
Forward overall
#2919
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Novak
UMass Boston · 2007-08
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Gibson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cyril Jebousek
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.