IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Shogan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NMH NE-Prep 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0152 0.0152 0.0350 0.0350
2022-23 NMH NE-Prep 23 0 4 4 0.174 0.0344 0.0344 0.0792 0.0792
2023-24 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 44 0 5 5 0.114 0.0262 0.0265 0.0556 0.0562
2024-25 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 46 0 5 5 0.109 0.0251 0.0241 0.0532 0.0510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 21 1 4 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · Lebanon Valley
+904.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27751
Defenseman overall
#4284
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Patullo
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Harley
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Christensen
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.