← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Swonger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 44 5 13 18 0.409 0.0461 0.0493 0.1392 0.1488
2022-23 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 41 8 28 36 0.878 0.0990 0.1009 0.2987 0.3045
2023-24 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 50 2 10 12 0.240 0.0555 0.0543 0.1941 0.1897
2024-25 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 50 3 7 10 0.200 0.0462 0.0431 0.1617 0.1509
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 23 3 1 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · St. John Fisher
+287.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9758
Defenseman overall
#2140
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2007-08
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.