← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Kidd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 19 0 4 4 0.210 0.0308 0.0328 0.1032 0.1098
2023-24 EHL 39 10 14 24 0.615 0.0900 0.0912 0.3017 0.3058
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 19 18 37 0.822 0.1203 0.1157 0.4031 0.3878
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC 19 1 3 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2025-26 · Worcester State
+132.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25538
Forward overall
#1439
Forward born in 2004
#699
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.