IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Baird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 24 1 1 2 0.083 0.0165 0.0165 0.0380 0.0380
2021-22 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 28 0 5 5 0.179 0.0354 0.0354 0.0814 0.0814
2022-23 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 27 2 10 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 36 0 3 3 0.083 0.0192 0.0193 0.0408 0.0409
2024-25 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 53 1 3 4 0.075 0.0308 0.0289 0.0607 0.0569
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Beloit
+745.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55760
Forward overall
#3941
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Benjamin Iwanowski
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Forget
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Jongmans
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.