← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Baird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 24 1 1 2 0.083 0.0161 0.0161 0.0381 0.0381
2021-22 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 28 0 5 5 0.179 0.0345 0.0345 0.0817 0.0817
2022-23 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 27 2 10 12 0.444 0.0857 0.0857 0.2034 0.2034
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 36 0 3 3 0.083 0.0122 0.0122 0.0408 0.0409
2024-25 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 53 1 3 4 0.075 0.0174 0.0163 0.0610 0.0572
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Beloit
+1354.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#55898
Forward overall
#3971
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.