IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benjamin Iwanowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — CCHL 49 5 13 18 0.367 0.0797 0.0758 0.2841 0.2702
2010-11 Oakville Blades OJHL 21 0 5 5 0.238 0.0584 0.0525 0.1637 0.1472
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 9 1 0 1 0.111
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 23 0 8 8 0.348
2011-12 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 17 1 3 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2011-12 · Wentworth
+302.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19216
Defenseman overall
#1800
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Stear
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike DiMascolo
Connecticut College · 2021-22
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Thacker
SUNY Potsdam · 2013-14
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.