IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brogan Andrus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rock Springs Miners USPHL-Premier 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0659 0.0700 0.0680 0.0723
2023-24 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHL 43 1 5 6 0.140 0.0491 0.0511 0.0684 0.0712
2024-25 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHL 44 12 10 22 0.500 0.1759 0.1741 0.2452 0.2427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Rivier
-41.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41753
Forward overall
#2734
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Karavos
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sardina
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.