← New Search ↗ Social Card

Benjamin Douglas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Walpole Express EHLP 15 1 6 7 0.467 0.0303 0.0317 0.1051 0.1098
2022-23 Walpole Express EHLP 42 8 22 30 0.714 0.0464 0.0461 0.1609 0.1598
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 32 1 1 2 0.062 0.0091 0.0091 0.0306 0.0307
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0163 0.0155 0.0545 0.0518
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 17 0 1 1 0.059
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Morrisville
+382.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24970
Defenseman overall
#4014
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2016-17
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.