IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Maybury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Elite 41 3 2 5 0.122 0.0091 0.0097 0.0280 0.0298
2022-23 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Elite 42 4 21 25 0.595 0.0443 0.0449 0.1364 0.1382
2023-24 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Premier 43 1 17 18 0.419 0.0472 0.0477 0.1424 0.1438
2024-25 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHL 45 1 20 21 0.467 0.0683 0.0673 0.2288 0.2255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11421
Defenseman overall
#2388
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

William Jones
SUNY Morrisville · 2021-22
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Meyers
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Hennessey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.