IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ralph Cuddemi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — OJHL 48 16 24 40 0.833 0.2042 0.2136 0.5737 0.6001
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 46 27 36 63 1.370 0.3357 0.3363 0.9430 0.9448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA SR 39 20 22 42 1.077
2014-15 Canisius D1 AHA JR 37 22 17 39 1.054
2013-14 Canisius D1 AHA SO 41 15 17 32 0.780
2012-13 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 4 6 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2012-13 · Canisius
+9.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12513
Forward overall
#462
Forward born in 1993
#296
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Mahony
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.