IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ralph Cuddemi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — OJHL 48 16 24 40 0.833 0.2503 0.2618 0.5704 0.5967
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 46 27 36 63 1.370 0.4114 0.4122 0.9375 0.9393
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA SR 39 20 22 42 1.077
2014-15 Canisius D1 AHA JR 37 22 17 39 1.054
2013-14 Canisius D1 AHA SO 41 15 17 32 0.780
2012-13 Canisius D1 AHA FR 37 4 6 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2012-13 · Canisius
-10.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11994
Forward overall
#441
Forward born in 1993
#349
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cam Darcy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Gilmour
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.