IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Folkes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 37 35 72 1.200 0.3832 0.3868 0.9289 0.9377
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 49 26 20 46 0.939 0.2998 0.2882 0.7267 0.6985
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 33 11 14 25 0.758
2018-19 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 39 18 24 42 1.077
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 38 13 10 23 0.605
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2016-17 · Penn State
+71.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12795
Forward overall
#520
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.