IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe McKeown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 9 11 20 0.377 0.0925 0.0955 0.2598 0.2683
2013-14 Wellington Dukes OJHL 52 15 17 32 0.615 0.1508 0.1480 0.4237 0.4158
2014-15 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 29 37 66 1.245 0.3052 0.2838 0.8574 0.7972
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 20 2 1 3 0.150
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 10 2 1 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Bowling Green
+52.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20947
Forward overall
#815
Forward born in 1994
#842
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brenden Kotyk
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Horan
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.