IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Garvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2451 0.2747 0.6885 0.7718
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 37 10 9 19 0.513 0.1259 0.1347 0.3535 0.3782
2014-15 Oakville Blades OJHL 42 14 10 24 0.571 0.1401 0.1427 0.3934 0.4006
2015-16 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 22 46 68 1.259 0.3087 0.2973 0.8670 0.8349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 33 6 4 10 0.303
2018-19 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 37 6 7 13 0.351
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 33 3 4 7 0.212
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 27 2 3 5 0.185
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2016-17 · St. Lawrence
-8.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20120
Forward overall
#797
Forward born in 1996
#786
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vili-Jesper Koivula
Canton · 2014-15
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jhuwon Davis
New England College · 2017-18
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.