IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Panetta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wellington Dukes OJHL 45 1 8 9 0.200 0.0490 0.0514 0.1377 0.1444
2014-15 Wellington Dukes OJHL 46 5 13 18 0.391 0.0959 0.0956 0.2694 0.2687
2015-16 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 9 36 45 0.957 0.2347 0.2211 0.6592 0.6210
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 33 3 3 6 0.182
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 1 5 6 0.167
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 31 2 3 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2016-17 · Colgate
0.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8068
Defenseman overall
#1319
Defenseman born in 1996
#1692
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2003-04
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Doyle
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.