← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Forester Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Milton Menace OJHL 29 3 6 9 0.310 0.0932 0.0932 0.2124 0.2124
2020-21 Milton Menace OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Milton Menace OJHL 27 4 21 25 0.926 0.2781 0.2847 0.6338 0.6489
2022-23 Milton Menace OJHL 45 10 28 38 0.844 0.2537 0.2468 0.5780 0.5622
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC JR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2023-24 · Yale
-83.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5353
Defenseman overall
#1354
Defenseman born in 2003
#1409
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.