IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Forester Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Milton Menace OJHL 29 3 6 9 0.310 0.0761 0.0761 0.2136 0.2136
2020-21 Milton Menace OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Milton Menace OJHL 27 4 21 25 0.926 0.2269 0.2323 0.6375 0.6527
2022-23 Milton Menace OJHL 45 10 28 38 0.844 0.2070 0.2014 0.5814 0.5655
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC JR 24 1 7 8 0.333
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 25 0 1 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2023-24 · Yale
-80.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5587
Defenseman overall
#1371
Defenseman born in 2003
#1133
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Czarnecki
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Boelter
Lawrence · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Berry
Wilkes · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.