IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Mizzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Caledon Admirals OJHL 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0545 0.0581 0.1530 0.1632
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2024-25 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2023-24 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2022-23 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2021-22 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2020-21 University of Toledo ACHA_D1 — — 19 6 6 12 0.632

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Teagan Waugh
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Willett
Hamilton · 2010-11
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2001-02
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.