IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Kimelman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-10 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Middlebury
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 North York Rangers OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Kimball Union NE-Prep 36 6 8 14 0.389 0.0770 0.0770 0.1772 0.1772
2024-25 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 12 11 23 0.697 0.1381 0.1381 0.3176 0.3176
2025-26 Toronto Patriots OJHL 16 4 6 10 0.625 0.1532 0.1490 0.4303 0.4185
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32570
Forward overall
#1761
Forward born in 2006
#1813
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Middlebury Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Antoine Bélisle
0.55
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Jack Silverman
0.76
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Tyler Wishart
0.73
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Brad Michalchuk
0.56
actual FR PPG at Middlebury

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Pennington
Marian · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Thieda
Norwich · 2009-10
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.